I hate compact flourescent bulbs. I know they’re eco-friendly, but the light they give off is cold and impersonal. They take a while to warm up to full brightness. LED lighting doesn’t have any of these problems. Philips launched a replacement for the normal household bulb last year, but at $40 each they were pretty much out of reach for everyone. The price is much lower now, but still too expensive to consider replacing: $27 at Home Depot. However, I was curious about their design and wanted to test them side-by-side against an incandesent. The two pictures below are taken with incandescent then LED.


Actually I lied, the top is LED and the bottom is incandescent. Did you notice an appreciable difference? The incandescent are slightly brighter, but the effect is enhanced a bit with the camera. From a performance perspective, they perform just like incandescent: instant-on, warm lighting. They are quite heavy compared to normal bulbs and still ridiculously expensive. They do use only 12W compared to 60W so they do save quite a bit of electricity.
Tags: bulb, led, lighting
Entries (RSS)